INDYCAR is no direct substitute for F1. But it can be just as great

Whenever you hear about an F1 fan having a look at an INDYCAR race, you can usually hear them comparing it against F1. Some have found INDYCAR highly exciting while others still say they find F1 more interesting to watch. Having followed both series, I can explain those differences and try to address the most common complaints.

Parity of the field

In Formula One, every team must have an independently designed car. Given the disparity of resources between the teams, that disparity also translates to lap times. Of course, even a team with great resources can end up with a failed design, and a team with limited resources can produce a highly competitive car. But more often than not, the teams with the greatest resources can also design the best cars. That leads to predictable races when the disparity in the performance of the cars is too big to overcome on track.

In INDYCAR, all the teams are using a single-make chassis with two engine options, closely matched in terms of performance. That means you will have a full field closer than the top 10 in F1 usually is. However, a spec chassis doesn't remove the engineering factor from INDYCAR. You still need to find the right setup to beat the other teams. However, when you don't need to design your own car, even a team with limited resources but a great engineering department can achieve success. And when the field is closer, a good driver can make a greater difference than in F1.

Would I like to see different chassis in INDYCAR? Surely it could be interesting, like in the 1990s' CART when you had Reynard, Lola, and Swift supplying multiple teams and Penske building their own chassis. However, the 2015-17 aero kit era hurt the parity of the field. While those seasons were still closer than F1, a single-make chassis can provide better competition on track, allowing drivers to make the difference. Spending money in chassis development isn't really that relevant spending, especially as having multiple chassis isn't such an essential part of INDYCAR's identity as it is for F1. I rather see INDYCAR continuing with an affordable spec-chassis formula that allows more teams to compete.

The tracks

This is where I think INDYCAR really has it better than F1. F1 goes to 21 tracks, 16 of which are permanent venues and six are temporary venues. INDYCAR goes to 16 tracks, six of which are permanent road courses, four are street courses, and six are ovals.

Not only INDYCAR has the greater variety of tracks because of the ovals but its road and street courses are also more exciting than those in F1. While F1 keeps on going to new, increasingly similar tracks, the INDYCAR tracks still have more character and an old-school feeling. Paved runoffs aren't as common at INDYCAR tracks as they are in F1. Instead of the constant runoff abuse controversy of F1, in INDYCAR the track limits are where the paved surface ends and you don't want to go to gravel or grass.

That old-school feeling applies also to street courses in INDYCAR. While F1's street courses have silk-smooth surfaces, INDYCAR's venues still have the usual characteristics of street courses with bumpy surfaces and even concrete patches in some of the turns. That puts drivers' skills to an even greater test.

Oval racing vs. road racing

Oval racing is probably the greatest difference between F1 and INDYCAR. An ignorant F1 fan might say "INDYCAR is only ovals" and an INDYCAR fond of oval racing fan might reply "I wish it was".

Ovals make up just over a third of the INDYCAR schedule, though oval racing is what separates it from other open-wheel categories. However, oval racing is also something that those used to road racing can't always appreciate.

You can hear people watching oval racing for the first time saying it's only going around in circles. But they're doing that at over 220 MPH (350 km/h) on superspeedways, inches apart from other cars, requiring skill and courage. It's amazing to see the drivers maneuvering their cars at those speeds, trying to get to the front of the field. Success on road courses doesn't automatically make you a great oval racer, just like success on ovals doesn't automatically make you a great road racer.

Oval racing is more than just turning left. Oval races are usually the longest ones in the series and you are still working on the setup throughout the race. If you are leading and running in the clean air, you want to trim out the downforce for less drag. If you're running in the dirty air in the traffic, you want to have more downforce. And even with the spec chassis, your setup still needs to be good to win.

Some people may say oval races are won by whoever happens to be leading at the right moment. For sure, sometimes the draft makes it difficult to pull away from your rivals and defend against them. However, before you can win, you must be in a position to race for the win. You can't just suddenly make your way from the back to the front of the field. Close races where the timing of the pass for the lead may decide the victory are just a part of the game. And not all oval races are like that. Short ovals are different from the superspeedways; it's easier to pull away when the straights aren't that long and to pass you need to carry more speed from the turn as the straights aren't long enough for drafting.

I don't have a real preference between oval and road racing because they both can be great. Though the rarity of open-wheel oval races makes them special, something that even F1 doesn't have. And INDYCAR's crown jewel, the Greatest Spectacle in Racing is an oval race.

Indy 500

When talking about oval racing, you have to bring up the Indianapolis 500. There is no other race like the 500. It's one of the races alongside the Monaco Grand Prix and the 24 Hours of Le Mans making up the Triple Crown of Motorsports.

The Monaco GP feels like the least special of the legs of the Triple Crown. While Indianapolis and Le Mans stand out in INDYCAR and the FIA WEC as races bigger than championship with an expanded field, Monaco is more like a typical F1 race. And while Monaco is a unique challenge in the F1 schedule, the narrow and twisty street circuit usually produces boring races which have been decided already in the qualifying.

The Indy 500 is surely the most intense of the Triple Crown races. Indianapolis Motor Speedway is an ideal oval for close open-wheel racing. The front and back straights are long enough for drafting so you can't pull away from your rivals. However, passing is still a challenge when you have to carry enough speed through the turns in dirty air to pass from the draft on the following straight.

Yes, it takes some luck to win the 500. It's difficult to defend the lead because of the draft the car behind gets, unless you're running with less downforce for higher straightline speed. Leading with two laps to go may be too early because you likely won't get a chance to reclaim the lead if you get passed. Then again, you want to be leading those final laps because any incident can bring out the caution and effectively finish the race. That's a part of the game at the 500, and that's what makes it so exciting.

The Indy 500 may be a bigger race than the Verizon IndyCar Series championship. While I'm not a huge fan of valuing a single race over a series championship in open-wheel racing, I have to admit there are some good reasons for that. As the American open-wheel racing has had different sanctioning bodies and has gone through splits and unifications, the Indy 500 represents something permanent. That's a race that has attracted drivers from other series around the world.

Fernando Alonso may never join INDYCAR full-time but he wants to return to the 500. An F1 World Champion doesn't need to prove himself by winning an INDYCAR championship, though he wants to complete the Triple Crown with Indy and Le Mans wins. I hope his dream of the Triple Crown ignites other drivers' interest to attempt the same as well as makes fans exploring different series.

Caution procedures

INDYCAR's caution procedures with initially closed pits are often criticized, especially by those who are used to F1's procedure with open pits but also by hardcore INDYCAR fans. I, for one, don't really like closing the pits when the caution comes out, ruining the strategy of those who were to pit in the following laps.

However, in a series which has ovals where you lose a lap while you pit, closing the pits is actually fair. Otherwise those yet to pit can make their stops and those who had pitted can't unlap themselves while they are driving under a speed limit. A dual system with a virtual safety car and open pits for road courses, and the current procedure for the ovals could be a solution for the problem of closed pits.

That being said, the current system isn't really that unfair. You can minimize the risk of cautions by pitting as soon as the fuel window has opened. If you decide to stay out longer to run in clean air, you are taking the risk of a caution coming out. Though if there was a virtual safety car procedure, a strategy to pit early for fresh rubber could backfire if the virtual safety car came out. There are always winners and losers from a caution period, regardless of the procedures. And when there are 17 races in the season, the good and bad luck will cancel each other out.

There are people who say INDYCAR has too many full-course yellows compared to F1. At ovals, those yellows are necessary. At road courses, the full-course yellow comes out only when local yellows aren't enough. A virtual safety car or local slow zones with a speed limit might be enough, though I'm fine with the pace car bunching the field. Yes, you lose any gap you had built. But if you're the fastest driver on track, you should be the fastest also from the restart.

Overtaking aids

Both F1 and INDYCAR have overtaking aids. F1 has the DRS, allowing you to open a flap of your rear wing to reduce the drag when you're less than a second behind the car ahead coming into the DRS zone. INDYCAR has the push-to-pass, giving drivers 60 extra horsepower for 200 seconds on the road courses. Drivers can use it to pass a car, defend against another car, or just to improve the lap time.

I prefer INDYCAR's system. DRS has made passing in F1 already too easy when the car ahead can't defend. INDYCAR's P2P is more of a strategic element; you can use it when you need to pass , defend, or improve your lap time. You still need to manage the use of P2P so that you aren't wasting those seconds when you don't need to.

Driver talent

Some people see IndyCar as the last resort for those who didn't make it in F1. To be fair, most drivers outside North America grew up dreaming of success in F1 and INDYCAR is only a Plan B for them. However, in North America INDYCAR is one of the two major leagues in motorsports and there are drivers who have dedicated their career to make it to INDYCAR. Not coming over to race in the European feeder series may have kept their talent hidden from F1 enthusiasts, though there is no other series where they'd rather be than in than INDYCAR.

Saying F1 has the 20 best drivers in the world is incorrect. Some of the smaller teams rather choose one with sponsors than one with talent, although that applies to INDYCAR as well. And while F1 probably has the most of the top talent in open-wheel racing, there are also ones who never got their deserved F1 chance and are now having success in INDYCAR.

The Kiwi Scott Dixon came over to America early in his career, missing the European feeder ladder. In 2004, a year after his first IRL championship, he got to test for Williams F1 Team. As he wasn't selected to Williams' F1 lineup despite showing competitive pace in the tests, he continued racing in America, winning the Indy 500 and three more Verizon IndyCar Series championships.

After almost winning his debut INDYCAR race, Robert Wickens showed why he's one of the best active drivers who haven't made it to F1. In 2011 he beat the likes of Jean-Éric Vergne, Alexander Rossi, Daniel Ricciardo, and Brendon Hartley for the Formula Renault 3.5 championship. However, instead of making his way to F1, he spent the following six years in Mercedes' DTM program before joining INDYCAR this year.

Some people like to point out how competitive Fernando Alonso was at the Indy 500 last year, saying an INDYCAR driver couldn't do that in an F1 car. However, INDYCAR's close field is an environment where a driver can show his talent unlike F1 where Alonso has been struggling with the uncompetitive McLaren. Besides, McLaren was partnering Andretti Autosport for their Indy program, which was the dominant team of the Month of May with the Andretti driver Takuma Sato winning. If you put someone like Scott Dixon into a Mercedes F1 car and give him 10 days of testing on a particular track, I'm sure he could impress.

If somebody is saying F1 veteran Takuma Sato's win at the 500 shows the superior talent of F1 drivers, you'd better look at his championship finishes. The eight place, boosted by the 500's double points, equals his best championship finish in F1. However, Sato has won two races in INDYCAR while his best result in F1 was a third place, funnily enough in the US Grand Prix at Indianapolis.

Sato is the kind of a driver who can be as good as anybody on a good day but lacks the consistency to contend for the championship. In F1 that is not good enough to get into a winning car. In INDYCAR with a more level playing field, you don't have to be in one of the best teams to win a race. While Andretti was the best team at the 500 last year, he achieved his other win while driving for A.J. Foyt Enterprises, a team which hadn't won since 2002, and hasn't since Sato's win at Long Beach in 2013.

F1 is a brutal environment for drivers. You need to be in the right place at the right time. Unless you have personal sponsors to buy you a seat, you'd better be a protege of some major team to get your chance in F1. And when there are seats opening in those teams, they may already have set their sights at some younger future stars, just look at all those former Red Bull juniors. A bad career move can cost you the chance to race for the championship and put you out of the radar of the major teams if you haven't had the equipment to impress.

In INDYCAR there are more teams able to win. Even if you weren't driving for a top team, the closer parity allows your talent to stand out and put you on the radar of big teams. Just look at Ed Jones who got the coveted Chip Ganassi Racing seat after a brilliant season with Dale Coyne Racing.

Some people think almost anybody can win in INDYCAR. Of course, there have been cases when a driver wouldn't have won without a lucky caution. But no, not everybody can win in INDYCAR. More drivers can win in INDYCAR than in F1 because more teams can win. Give F1 drivers spec cars with closely matched engines and surely more than five drivers would win in a season.

The teams

F1 teams generally have a stronger identity than INDYCAR teams. For F1 fans it's more common to cheer for a particular team like the traditional teams Ferrari, McLaren, and Williams, or a major car brand like Mercedes or even an engine supplier like Honda.

This is an area where I prefer F1 over INDYCAR. Despite Mercedes' long absence before joining F1 again as an engine supplier in the 1990s, Mercedes has Grand Prix heritage already from the 30s and it raced against Ferrari in the first decade of the World Championship in the 50s. McLaren was founded in the 1960s and Williams in the 70s and the success over the years has made those names iconic.

INDYCAR teams, or teams in American motorsports, don't really have such a strong identity, apart from maybe Penske. Of course, teams like Foyt, Andretti, and Rahal Letterman Lanigan keep former champions involved in the series. But American motorsports being more driver-centric is reflected also here; fans in general are rooting for their favorite drivers, not really for teams.

I'm not saying INDYCAR should be like F1 in this regard. INDYCAR teams come and go and the OEMs aren't joining as teams but as engine suppliers. Though I can see having teams with a strong identity as a strength for F1, something that hardly any other motorsport has. The interest you have in a certain team keeps you interested in the series.

That being said, I prefer how INDYCAR assigns the car numbers to teams. Something like 14 for Foyt is such an iconic number, and it's nice to see young drivers taking over some old legends' cars, like Ed Jones driving the No. 10 for Ganassi like Dan Wheldon and Dario Franchitti used to. That works well in a series where drivers stay in the same team for a long period, like Hélio Castroneves driving the No. 3 for Penske since 2000.

INDYCAR and F1 are different, though both can be great

INDYCAR is no direct substitute for F1; there are certain major differences between the two series. But that's also the great thing, they complement each other. Embrace the variety and watch them both!

I used to be an F1 fan first and foremost, though once I got into INDYCAR racing, it's become my favorite motorsport. This decade hasn't surely been the most exciting in F1, being dominated first by Red Bull, then Mercedes. INDYCAR offered the kind of close racing I was looking for.

I can understand those people who say there is too much randomness in INDYCAR. For sure it's unfortunate when a driver's race gets ruined by an unfortunate timing of a caution, though the rules are the same for everybody. And I used to feel after some oval races that another driver could've won with one more or one less lap but the only thing that matters is who's leading at the checkered flag. That's how those races work, deal with it!

I guess my mindset has changed a bit when I started following INDYCAR regularly. The kind of oval races where two or even more drivers are battling for the win on the final lap are the kind of excitement I really enjoy. It doesn't matter who led the most laps; what matters is who led the final lap.

Surely INDYCAR is missing the extensive technical competition F1 has. But when you have closer racing, I can't complain. That's what I tune in for.

And if you think INDYCAR is for those who couldn't make it in F1, don't forget there are talented drivers who've grown up wishing to win the Indy 500. Give them the appreciation they deserve for having the skills and courage to go inches apart from other cars at over 220 MPH.

Lack of mainstream media coverage surely makes it harder to follow INDYCAR. But we live in the era of social media and you don't need to rely on your local media for news. Go to Twitter and follow @IndyCar, @RACERmag, @Motorsport, @MotorSportsTalk... and of course @FINdyCar.